January 31, 2010
Family and friends,
I hope this blog entry finds everyone well. I first want to say thank you to everyone accompanying me here in Nicaragua through letters. Sitting down with your letters and your lives keeps me feeling connected to home and responding is always a beautiful way for me to process my time in Nicaragua so far. Thank you.
There is so much to say, already. Nicaragua is an incredible teacher, teaching me, a slow student, the ways of the world, the realities of an impoverished country, the struggles and hope that accompany la lucha. I know that anyone reading this is anxious to hear about those things, but there is time; two years, in fact. Today I would like to write about Haiti. Since the earthquake I have been deeply reflecting on what has happened to Haiti, what is happening to Haiti, and how I can best be in solidarity with our brothers and sisters in Haiti. The wonderful amounts of mail I receive leads me to believe that there are a handful of people that read this blog; thus, I will take this time to use the blog as a microphone, raising the volume of all the cries in Haiti that we are not hearing (or perhaps listening to). I'm sure by now U.S. Media has left all of you drowning in coverage of the damage, perhaps most of you have already donated money. I hope you'll continue reading, however, as the following, I believe, is essential to understanding the devastation in Haiti. Haiti and talking about Haiti right now are, at best, overwhelming; it is tiring to even think about. But bear with me.
Some of you are aware of my brief stint as an unofficial disaster-relief worker in El Salvador this past November. Two days of heavy rain killed 200, displaced thousands. With the breathe-taking mind and drive of Beth Tellman, a handful of us accompanied communities near Lake Illopango affected by the rain yet unable to get aid from relief organizations. (Beth is still living in El Salvador working with these communities. If you would like to read about her work and what is currently happening to the damaged areas please check out www.friendsofsantamaria.blogspot.com). The devastation I saw in the days and weeks that followed the rains is something I am still trying to process, as I have seen nothing like it. Perhaps this is why my heart and mind have felt so heavy for Haiti.
The most important thing that I learned from the destruction in El Salvador last November is that natural phenomena do not always create disasters. Two days of rain do not kill 200 people; poor infrastructure does. Haiti is no different.
We are all aware that natural phenomena are just that, unexpected and often unstoppable. It is our structures, however, that determine the level of destruction and disaster incurred by the natural phenomenon. Natural phenomena are often catalysts for disaster but it is poor infrastructure that really deserves the term “disaster” attached to it. There is nothing “natural” about 200,000 people dying in Haiti, no matter the magnitude of the earthquake. New Orleans, El Salvador, Haiti-- all examples of not-so-natural-disasters (as Beth so wisely puts it). These are not natural disasters, but humanitarian crises. What is essential, I believe, is understanding the difference between damage done by a natural occurrence vs. damage done by poor infrastructure; damage done and risk of vulnerability due to poverty. There is a direct correlation between the current devastation in Haiti and it being the poorest country in the Western Hemisphere (fyi- Nicaragua is the second poorest country in the hemisphere...). Impoverished countries carry with them an unbearable level of vulnerability. Would an earthquake of the same magnitude as Haiti kill 200,000 in Atlanta?
We have physically and metaphorically watched the structures come crumbling down, the structures that have failed millions and killed 200,000. The strongest hope that can come out of Haiti's tragedy is the understanding that the system has fallen and there is opportunity to build a new one, a better one, one that works for everyone. This is an opportunity to recognize the flaws of the system and change them and reflect on our vulnerability as human beings. This is a phenomenal chance for Haiti to rebuild itself, empower itself, and grow stronger as a community and country by creating a structure that works for their reality. With disaster and tragedy comes incredible potential for growth and empowerment. This opportunity will be missed, however, if Haiti is not allowed to take care of itself, heal itself, with organizations that precede the earthquake and people that have cared about Haiti before disaster struck. We must allow Haiti to empower itself by letting it recreate itself, us, the U.S., as foreigners, accompanying the process. This means, I believe, an extremely critical look at our military presence in Haiti and the Obama-Clinton-Bush alliance that seeks to give our own failing structures a boost. Without going too political, because that is not the point of this reflection, I believe it is important to truly understand US involvement in Haiti as an example of Disaster Capitalism, that the US economy will gain due to reconstruction efforts by US-based companies. The irony in it all being that, pre-earthquake, it has been many US-based companies and multinational corporations that have kept Haiti from reconstructing their poor infrastructure, ie. Haiti's labor being put into companies that do not re-invest in Haiti.
So what can we do? Our heads hung low by the state of world, perhaps angered by the political commentary above. There are endless ways to be in solidarity with Haiti, no matter where we stand. The most important thing we can do, in my opinion, requires no money. Do research, understand, think critically. Investigate why US military presence is there, why they have control and why they are turning away aid, doctors, organizations, etc. Ask yourself what it is that you do in everyday life (what you eat, wear, buy, consume) that perpetuates poverty and weak infrastructures in Haiti. Research policies that affect Haiti's infrastructure like immigration (especially with the Dominican Republic) or the current role of the International Monetary Fund. These things may be more important than the $20 we might donate with good intentions but without intentionality.
Think critically, think beyond the immediate crisis, think about Haiti's future as it begins to reconstruct itself. Allow Haiti to reconstruct itself and empower itself by accompanying the process and not doing it for them. This is essential, I believe, for Haiti to have a chance to not just struggle to survive in poverty but, in time, thrive as a country in a way it has never been given a chance to do.
If people feel called to donate monetarily, donate to local Haitian organizations that predate the disaster and will maintain a Haitian presence. What we quickly learned in El Salvador is that aid first goes to the service providers and, for them, as competing organizations, aid is power. How we donate affects the groups that are in power. So why not look for Haitian organizations that understand Haiti and are looking for long-term/structural change? I have been told to always avoid aid organizations bigger than the government of the country. Furthermore, I would imagine local public health institutions are the most knowledgeable but now with the fewest resources and the most overworked. Paul Farmer's organization, Partners in Health, has been mentioned to me several times as a great organization, thought I openly suggest it without doing the research.
This is what I offer to Haiti as an act of solidarity. A weeks worth of intentional reflection, two hours of my Sunday afternoon to try and tackle this and stand up for Haiti, a belief in Haiti to rebuild themselves through our accompaniment. Let us invest in Haiti beyond aid, sitting with Haiti in its suffering and then walking with Haiti as it puts itself back together. If we let it be, this is a chance for Haiti to overcome tragedy and thrive; it will not come from our wallets and our military, but our trust that Haiti is smart enough and beautiful enough to use the aid to do it themselves. This does not mean we leave Haiti alone in their dark hour; rather, it calls us to accompany Haiti as it pulls itself out of the rubble.
